PR. VI. KARUIHA PURVA PS 91
RAMSEVAK SHUKLA
BSPBSP224 votes at this polling station
over AJAY KUMAR (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 224 | 70.00% | |
| 2 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 64 | 20.00% | |
| 3 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 27 | 8.44% | |
| 4 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 3 | 0.94% | |
| 5 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 1 | 0.31% | |
| 6 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 1 | 0.31% | |
| 7 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 320 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 224 | 68.92% | 1 | 26 | Strong |
| BJP | 64 | 19.69% | 2 | 339 | Weak |
| SP | 27 | 8.31% | 3 | 381 | Poor |
| RVP | 3 | 0.92% | 4 | 83 | Poor |
| AK | 1 | 0.31% | 5 | 307 | Poor |
| CPI | 1 | 0.31% | 6 | 320 | Poor |
| INC | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 359 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 362 | Poor |
| BSWP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 292 | Poor |
| ASP | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 310 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 333 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 324 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.