POORV. MA. VI. AMBEDKAR NAGAR ROOM N0 2 PS 90
RAMSEVAK SHUKLA
BSPBSP320 votes at this polling station
over AJAY KUMAR (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 320 | 45.07% | |
| 2 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 196 | 27.61% | |
| 3 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 143 | 20.14% | |
| 4 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 19 | 2.68% | |
| 5 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 7 | 0.99% | |
| 6 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 6 | 0.85% | |
| 7 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 5 | 0.70% | |
| 8 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 5 | 0.70% | |
| 9 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 3 | 0.42% | |
| 10 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 3 | 0.42% | |
| 11 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 2 | 0.28% | |
| 12 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 1 | 0.14% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 710 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 320 | 44.32% | 1 | 5 | Strong |
| BJP | 196 | 27.15% | 2 | 166 | Average |
| SP | 143 | 19.81% | 3 | 244 | Weak |
| BMP | 19 | 2.63% | 4 | 2 | Poor |
| AK | 7 | 0.97% | 5 | 75 | Poor |
| ASP | 6 | 0.83% | 6 | 6 | Poor |
| CPI | 5 | 0.69% | 7 | 105 | Poor |
| RVP | 5 | 0.69% | 8 | 27 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.42% | 9 | 243 | Poor |
| JAP | 3 | 0.42% | 10 | 221 | Poor |
| BSWP | 2 | 0.28% | 11 | 72 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.14% | 12 | 216 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.