POORV. MA. VI. AMBEDKAR NAGAR ROOM N0 1 PS 89
RAMSEVAK SHUKLA
BSPBSP329 votes at this polling station
over VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 329 | 55.95% | |
| 2 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 136 | 23.13% | |
| 3 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 87 | 14.80% | |
| 4 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 19 | 3.23% | |
| 5 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 7 | 1.19% | |
| 6 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 3 | 0.51% | |
| 7 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 8 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 9 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 10 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 11 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 12 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 588 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 329 | 55.57% | 1 | 3 | Strong |
| SP | 136 | 22.97% | 2 | 255 | Weak |
| BJP | 87 | 14.70% | 3 | 313 | Weak |
| BMP | 19 | 3.21% | 4 | 1 | Poor |
| CPI | 7 | 1.18% | 5 | 57 | Poor |
| JAP | 3 | 0.51% | 6 | 220 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.34% | 8 | 134 | Poor |
| AK | 2 | 0.34% | 7 | 249 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.17% | 9 | 180 | Poor |
| BSWP | 1 | 0.17% | 10 | 169 | Poor |
| RVP | 1 | 0.17% | 11 | 208 | Poor |
| INC | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 358 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.