PR. VI. TOLAKAJI PS 7
AJAY KUMAR
BJPBJP326 votes at this polling station
over VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 326 | 48.37% | |
| 2 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 277 | 41.10% | |
| 3 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 42 | 6.23% | |
| 4 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 8 | 1.19% | |
| 5 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 7 | 1.04% | |
| 6 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 5 | 0.74% | |
| 7 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 8 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 9 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 10 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 11 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 12 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 674 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 326 | 47.73% | 1 | 37 | Strong |
| SP | 277 | 40.56% | 2 | 93 | Strong |
| BSP | 42 | 6.15% | 3 | 282 | Poor |
| INC | 8 | 1.17% | 4 | 55 | Poor |
| CPI | 7 | 1.02% | 5 | 54 | Poor |
| BMP | 5 | 0.73% | 6 | 20 | Poor |
| ASP | 2 | 0.29% | 7 | 72 | Poor |
| AK | 2 | 0.29% | 8 | 234 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.29% | 9 | 263 | Poor |
| RVP | 2 | 0.29% | 10 | 121 | Poor |
| BSWP | 1 | 0.15% | 11 | 137 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 300 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.