POORV. MA. VI. V.UMARHANI ROOM N0 3 PS 66
VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV
SPSP325 votes at this polling station
over RAMSEVAK SHUKLA (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 325 | 64.10% | |
| 2 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 91 | 17.95% | |
| 3 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 47 | 9.27% | |
| 4 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 13 | 2.56% | |
| 5 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 8 | 1.58% | |
| 6 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 7 | 1.38% | |
| 7 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 6 | 1.18% | |
| 8 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 3 | 0.59% | |
| 9 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 3 | 0.59% | |
| 10 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 11 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 12 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 1 | 0.20% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 507 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 325 | 62.86% | 1 | 54 | Strong |
| BSP | 91 | 17.60% | 2 | 175 | Weak |
| BJP | 47 | 9.09% | 3 | 352 | Poor |
| AK | 13 | 2.51% | 4 | 21 | Poor |
| JAP | 8 | 1.55% | 5 | 110 | Poor |
| BSCP | 7 | 1.35% | 6 | 14 | Poor |
| INC | 6 | 1.16% | 7 | 123 | Poor |
| ASP | 3 | 0.58% | 8 | 37 | Poor |
| BMP | 3 | 0.58% | 9 | 71 | Poor |
| CPI | 2 | 0.39% | 10 | 265 | Poor |
| BSWP | 1 | 0.19% | 11 | 157 | Poor |
| RVP | 1 | 0.19% | 12 | 201 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.