PR. VI. PARAS ROOM N0 2 PS 57
AJAY KUMAR
BJPBJP246 votes at this polling station
over RAMSEVAK SHUKLA (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 246 | 48.62% | |
| 2 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 127 | 25.10% | |
| 3 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 54 | 10.67% | |
| 4 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 30 | 5.93% | |
| 5 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 19 | 3.75% | |
| 6 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 11 | 2.17% | |
| 7 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 6 | 1.19% | |
| 8 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 5 | 0.99% | |
| 9 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 5 | 0.99% | |
| 10 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 3 | 0.59% | |
| 11 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 506 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 246 | 47.40% | 1 | 93 | Strong |
| BSP | 127 | 24.47% | 2 | 112 | Weak |
| SP | 54 | 10.40% | 3 | 369 | Weak |
| AK | 30 | 5.78% | 4 | 9 | Poor |
| JAP | 19 | 3.66% | 5 | 54 | Poor |
| INC | 11 | 2.12% | 6 | 30 | Poor |
| ASP | 6 | 1.16% | 7 | 5 | Poor |
| BMP | 5 | 0.96% | 8 | 23 | Poor |
| CPI | 5 | 0.96% | 9 | 102 | Poor |
| RVP | 3 | 0.58% | 10 | 79 | Poor |
| BSWP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 279 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 313 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.