PR. VI. PARAS ROOM N0 1 PS 56
VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV
SPSP203 votes at this polling station
over AJAY KUMAR (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 203 | 33.12% | |
| 2 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 181 | 29.53% | |
| 3 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 147 | 23.98% | |
| 4 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 62 | 10.11% | |
| 5 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 4 | 0.65% | |
| 6 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 4 | 0.65% | |
| 7 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 4 | 0.65% | |
| 8 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 3 | 0.49% | |
| 9 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 10 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 11 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 12 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 613 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 203 | 32.64% | 1 | 173 | Average |
| BJP | 181 | 29.10% | 2 | 197 | Average |
| JAP | 147 | 23.63% | 3 | 2 | Weak |
| BSP | 62 | 9.97% | 4 | 227 | Poor |
| CPI | 4 | 0.64% | 6 | 146 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.64% | 7 | 195 | Poor |
| BMP | 4 | 0.64% | 5 | 43 | Poor |
| BSWP | 3 | 0.48% | 8 | 30 | Poor |
| AK | 2 | 0.32% | 9 | 244 | Poor |
| RVP | 2 | 0.32% | 10 | 131 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.16% | 11 | 171 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 312 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.