PR. VI. ADHAV ROOM N0 2 PS 50
VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV
SPSP283 votes at this polling station
over AJAY KUMAR (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 283 | 57.17% | |
| 2 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 165 | 33.33% | |
| 3 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 22 | 4.44% | |
| 4 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 8 | 1.62% | |
| 5 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 4 | 0.81% | |
| 6 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 3 | 0.61% | |
| 7 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 3 | 0.61% | |
| 8 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 9 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 10 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 11 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 12 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 1 | 0.20% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 495 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 283 | 56.04% | 1 | 87 | Strong |
| BJP | 165 | 32.67% | 2 | 228 | Average |
| BSP | 22 | 4.36% | 3 | 329 | Poor |
| JAP | 8 | 1.58% | 4 | 108 | Poor |
| RVP | 4 | 0.79% | 5 | 47 | Poor |
| AK | 3 | 0.59% | 6 | 190 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.59% | 7 | 238 | Poor |
| BMP | 2 | 0.40% | 8 | 133 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.40% | 9 | 124 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.20% | 10 | 169 | Poor |
| BSWP | 1 | 0.20% | 11 | 152 | Poor |
| CPI | 1 | 0.20% | 12 | 315 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.