PR. VI. ADHAV ROOM N0 1 PS 49
RAMSEVAK SHUKLA
BSPBSP169 votes at this polling station
over VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 169 | 42.36% | |
| 2 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 116 | 29.07% | |
| 3 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 100 | 25.06% | |
| 4 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 3 | 0.75% | |
| 5 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 3 | 0.75% | |
| 6 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 2 | 0.50% | |
| 7 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 2 | 0.50% | |
| 8 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 2 | 0.50% | |
| 9 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 10 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 11 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 399 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 169 | 41.73% | 1 | 57 | Strong |
| SP | 116 | 28.64% | 2 | 293 | Average |
| BJP | 100 | 24.69% | 3 | 301 | Weak |
| BMP | 3 | 0.74% | 4 | 70 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.74% | 5 | 237 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.49% | 8 | 272 | Poor |
| AK | 2 | 0.49% | 6 | 241 | Poor |
| CPI | 2 | 0.49% | 7 | 259 | Poor |
| RVP | 1 | 0.25% | 10 | 198 | Poor |
| BSWP | 1 | 0.25% | 9 | 151 | Poor |
| ASP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 294 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 310 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.