PR. VI. KALANA PS 46
VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV
SPSP226 votes at this polling station
over AJAY KUMAR (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 226 | 36.57% | |
| 2 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 222 | 35.92% | |
| 3 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 144 | 23.30% | |
| 4 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 7 | 1.13% | |
| 5 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 4 | 0.65% | |
| 6 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 3 | 0.49% | |
| 7 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 3 | 0.49% | |
| 8 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 3 | 0.49% | |
| 9 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 10 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 11 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 12 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 618 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 226 | 36.16% | 1 | 144 | Average |
| BJP | 222 | 35.52% | 2 | 123 | Average |
| BSP | 144 | 23.04% | 3 | 87 | Weak |
| INC | 7 | 1.12% | 4 | 93 | Poor |
| CPI | 4 | 0.64% | 5 | 142 | Poor |
| JAP | 3 | 0.48% | 8 | 217 | Poor |
| ASP | 3 | 0.48% | 6 | 36 | Poor |
| AK | 3 | 0.48% | 7 | 189 | Poor |
| BMP | 2 | 0.32% | 9 | 132 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.32% | 10 | 123 | Poor |
| RVP | 2 | 0.32% | 11 | 129 | Poor |
| BSWP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 272 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.