POORV. MA. VI. ARMAR ROOM N0 2 PS 44
VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV
SPSP235 votes at this polling station
over AJAY KUMAR (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 235 | 51.42% | |
| 2 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 114 | 24.95% | |
| 3 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 68 | 14.88% | |
| 4 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 22 | 4.81% | |
| 5 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 3 | 0.66% | |
| 6 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 3 | 0.66% | |
| 7 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 3 | 0.66% | |
| 8 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 3 | 0.66% | |
| 9 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 3 | 0.66% | |
| 10 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 2 | 0.44% | |
| 11 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 12 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 457 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 235 | 50.98% | 1 | 135 | Strong |
| BJP | 114 | 24.73% | 2 | 284 | Weak |
| JAP | 68 | 14.75% | 3 | 13 | Weak |
| BSP | 22 | 4.77% | 4 | 328 | Poor |
| BSWP | 3 | 0.65% | 7 | 28 | Poor |
| RVP | 3 | 0.65% | 9 | 77 | Poor |
| BMP | 3 | 0.65% | 6 | 69 | Poor |
| AK | 3 | 0.65% | 5 | 187 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.65% | 8 | 236 | Poor |
| CPI | 2 | 0.43% | 10 | 258 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.22% | 11 | 167 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 308 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.