PR. VI. KONI PS 376
VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV
SPSP213 votes at this polling station
over ASHOK KUMAR (JAP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 213 | 35.15% | |
| 2 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 133 | 21.95% | |
| 3 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 108 | 17.82% | |
| 4 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 87 | 14.36% | |
| 5 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 40 | 6.60% | |
| 6 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 6 | 0.99% | |
| 7 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 5 | 0.83% | |
| 8 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 4 | 0.66% | |
| 9 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 4 | 0.66% | |
| 10 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 3 | 0.50% | |
| 11 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 12 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 1 | 0.17% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 606 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 213 | 34.30% | 1 | 164 | Average |
| JAP | 133 | 21.42% | 2 | 4 | Weak |
| BJP | 108 | 17.39% | 3 | 296 | Weak |
| BSP | 87 | 14.01% | 4 | 186 | Weak |
| AK | 40 | 6.44% | 5 | 5 | Poor |
| INC | 6 | 0.97% | 6 | 155 | Poor |
| BSWP | 5 | 0.81% | 7 | 14 | Poor |
| ASP | 4 | 0.64% | 8 | 31 | Poor |
| BMP | 4 | 0.64% | 9 | 67 | Poor |
| RVP | 3 | 0.48% | 10 | 118 | Poor |
| CPI | 2 | 0.32% | 11 | 305 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.16% | 12 | 293 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.