U. PR. VI. PALHARI ROOM N0 1 PS 370
AJAY KUMAR
BJPBJP265 votes at this polling station
over RAMSEVAK SHUKLA (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 265 | 50.77% | |
| 2 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 112 | 21.46% | |
| 3 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 107 | 20.50% | |
| 4 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 9 | 1.72% | |
| 5 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 7 | 1.34% | |
| 6 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 7 | 1.34% | |
| 7 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 4 | 0.77% | |
| 8 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 3 | 0.57% | |
| 9 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 3 | 0.57% | |
| 10 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 3 | 0.57% | |
| 11 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 2 | 0.38% | |
| 12 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 522 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 265 | 48.01% | 1 | 79 | Strong |
| BSP | 112 | 20.29% | 2 | 143 | Weak |
| SP | 107 | 19.38% | 3 | 310 | Weak |
| INC | 9 | 1.63% | 4 | 54 | Poor |
| AK | 7 | 1.27% | 5 | 87 | Poor |
| CPI | 7 | 1.27% | 6 | 70 | Poor |
| ASP | 4 | 0.72% | 7 | 30 | Poor |
| BMP | 3 | 0.54% | 8 | 118 | Poor |
| BSWP | 3 | 0.54% | 9 | 61 | Poor |
| RVP | 3 | 0.54% | 10 | 117 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.36% | 11 | 192 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 385 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.