PR. VI. LAULITIKAMAU ROOM N0 1 PS 357
VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV
SPSP417 votes at this polling station
over AJAY KUMAR (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 417 | 63.86% | |
| 2 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 165 | 25.27% | |
| 3 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 44 | 6.74% | |
| 4 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 9 | 1.38% | |
| 5 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 5 | 0.77% | |
| 6 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 3 | 0.46% | |
| 7 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 2 | 0.31% | |
| 8 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 2 | 0.31% | |
| 9 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 2 | 0.31% | |
| 10 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 2 | 0.31% | |
| 11 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 12 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 1 | 0.15% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 653 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 417 | 62.99% | 1 | 21 | Strong |
| BJP | 165 | 24.92% | 2 | 230 | Weak |
| BSP | 44 | 6.65% | 3 | 276 | Poor |
| JAP | 9 | 1.36% | 4 | 106 | Poor |
| CPI | 5 | 0.76% | 5 | 128 | Poor |
| AK | 3 | 0.45% | 6 | 230 | Poor |
| ASP | 2 | 0.30% | 7 | 151 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.30% | 9 | 318 | Poor |
| RVP | 2 | 0.30% | 10 | 181 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.30% | 8 | 189 | Poor |
| BSWP | 1 | 0.15% | 12 | 249 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.15% | 11 | 303 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.