PR. VI. SAYA PS 349
AJAY KUMAR
BJPBJP93 votes at this polling station
over VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 93 | 40.79% | |
| 2 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 73 | 32.02% | |
| 3 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 48 | 21.05% | |
| 4 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 5 | 2.19% | |
| 5 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 4 | 1.75% | |
| 6 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 2 | 0.88% | |
| 7 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 1 | 0.44% | |
| 8 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 1 | 0.44% | |
| 9 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 1 | 0.44% | |
| 10 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 228 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 93 | 40.09% | 1 | 308 | Strong |
| SP | 73 | 31.47% | 2 | 352 | Average |
| BSP | 48 | 20.69% | 3 | 258 | Weak |
| CPI | 5 | 2.16% | 4 | 127 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 1.72% | 5 | 230 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.86% | 6 | 307 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.43% | 7 | 301 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.43% | 8 | 283 | Poor |
| BSWP | 1 | 0.43% | 9 | 246 | Poor |
| ASP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 372 | Poor |
| AK | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 383 | Poor |
| RVP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 378 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.