PR. VI. KARINGA PS 346
ASHOK KUMAR
JAPJAP113 votes at this polling station
over VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 113 | 33.14% | |
| 2 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 75 | 21.99% | |
| 3 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 74 | 21.70% | |
| 4 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 49 | 14.37% | |
| 5 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 8 | 2.35% | |
| 6 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 8 | 2.35% | |
| 7 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 3 | 0.88% | |
| 8 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 3 | 0.88% | |
| 9 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 3 | 0.88% | |
| 10 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 3 | 0.88% | |
| 11 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 2 | 0.59% | |
| 12 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 341 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JAP | 113 | 32.66% | 1 | 6 | Average |
| SP | 75 | 21.68% | 2 | 349 | Weak |
| BJP | 74 | 21.39% | 3 | 329 | Weak |
| BSP | 49 | 14.16% | 4 | 256 | Weak |
| BSCP | 8 | 2.31% | 5 | 11 | Poor |
| INC | 8 | 2.31% | 6 | 85 | Poor |
| CPI | 3 | 0.87% | 10 | 246 | Poor |
| BMP | 3 | 0.87% | 9 | 115 | Poor |
| ASP | 3 | 0.87% | 7 | 67 | Poor |
| AK | 3 | 0.87% | 8 | 226 | Poor |
| BSWP | 2 | 0.58% | 11 | 129 | Poor |
| RVP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 376 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.