PR. VI. BACHAUNDHA PS 341
VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV
SPSP414 votes at this polling station
over AJAY KUMAR (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 414 | 75.41% | |
| 2 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 87 | 15.85% | |
| 3 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 18 | 3.28% | |
| 4 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 13 | 2.37% | |
| 5 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 5 | 0.91% | |
| 6 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 4 | 0.73% | |
| 7 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 3 | 0.55% | |
| 8 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 9 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 10 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 11 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 12 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 549 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 414 | 74.86% | 1 | 22 | Strong |
| BJP | 87 | 15.73% | 2 | 314 | Weak |
| BSP | 18 | 3.25% | 3 | 342 | Poor |
| JAP | 13 | 2.35% | 4 | 69 | Poor |
| AK | 5 | 0.90% | 5 | 135 | Poor |
| BSCP | 4 | 0.72% | 6 | 54 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.54% | 7 | 279 | Poor |
| CPI | 2 | 0.36% | 8 | 301 | Poor |
| BSWP | 1 | 0.18% | 11 | 243 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.18% | 9 | 262 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.18% | 10 | 298 | Poor |
| RVP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 375 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.