PR. VI. MARAULI ROOM N0 2 PS 329
VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV
SPSP524 votes at this polling station
over AJAY KUMAR (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 524 | 70.05% | |
| 2 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 122 | 16.31% | |
| 3 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 58 | 7.75% | |
| 4 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 10 | 1.34% | |
| 5 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 10 | 1.34% | |
| 6 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 9 | 1.20% | |
| 7 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 5 | 0.67% | |
| 8 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 3 | 0.40% | |
| 9 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 3 | 0.40% | |
| 10 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 2 | 0.27% | |
| 11 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 12 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 1 | 0.13% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 748 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 524 | 69.04% | 1 | 8 | Strong |
| BJP | 122 | 16.07% | 2 | 277 | Weak |
| BSP | 58 | 7.64% | 3 | 239 | Poor |
| JAP | 10 | 1.32% | 5 | 94 | Poor |
| AK | 10 | 1.32% | 4 | 39 | Poor |
| BSWP | 9 | 1.19% | 6 | 1 | Poor |
| BMP | 5 | 0.66% | 7 | 34 | Poor |
| ASP | 3 | 0.40% | 8 | 64 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.40% | 9 | 277 | Poor |
| RVP | 2 | 0.26% | 10 | 174 | Poor |
| CPI | 1 | 0.13% | 12 | 356 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.13% | 11 | 276 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.