U. PR. VI. BISANDI (1-8 COMPOSITE) ROOM N0 1 PS 325
VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV
SPSP195 votes at this polling station
over RAMSEVAK SHUKLA (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 195 | 37.94% | |
| 2 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 133 | 25.88% | |
| 3 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 128 | 24.90% | |
| 4 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 22 | 4.28% | |
| 5 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 17 | 3.31% | |
| 6 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 7 | 1.36% | |
| 7 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 3 | 0.58% | |
| 8 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 3 | 0.58% | |
| 9 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 3 | 0.58% | |
| 10 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 3 | 0.58% | |
| 11 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 514 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 195 | 37.36% | 1 | 184 | Average |
| BSP | 133 | 25.48% | 2 | 105 | Average |
| BJP | 128 | 24.52% | 3 | 273 | Weak |
| AK | 22 | 4.21% | 4 | 14 | Poor |
| INC | 17 | 3.26% | 5 | 13 | Poor |
| JAP | 7 | 1.34% | 6 | 133 | Poor |
| ASP | 3 | 0.57% | 7 | 62 | Poor |
| BMP | 3 | 0.57% | 8 | 111 | Poor |
| BSCP | 3 | 0.57% | 9 | 108 | Poor |
| CPI | 3 | 0.57% | 10 | 244 | Poor |
| RVP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 370 | Poor |
| BSWP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 361 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.