PR. VI. BHITI ROOM N0 2 PS 321
VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV
SPSP355 votes at this polling station
over ASHOK KUMAR (JAP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 355 | 73.65% | |
| 2 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 53 | 11.00% | |
| 3 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 51 | 10.58% | |
| 4 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 6 | 1.24% | |
| 5 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 4 | 0.83% | |
| 6 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 3 | 0.62% | |
| 7 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 3 | 0.62% | |
| 8 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 2 | 0.41% | |
| 9 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 2 | 0.41% | |
| 10 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 2 | 0.41% | |
| 11 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 12 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 482 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 355 | 73.35% | 1 | 40 | Strong |
| JAP | 53 | 10.95% | 2 | 21 | Weak |
| BJP | 51 | 10.54% | 3 | 349 | Weak |
| BSP | 6 | 1.24% | 4 | 368 | Poor |
| AK | 4 | 0.83% | 5 | 173 | Poor |
| RVP | 3 | 0.62% | 7 | 112 | Poor |
| BSCP | 3 | 0.62% | 6 | 106 | Poor |
| BSWP | 2 | 0.41% | 8 | 124 | Poor |
| CPI | 2 | 0.41% | 9 | 297 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.41% | 10 | 314 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.21% | 11 | 258 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 379 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.