PR. VI. ITVAN PS 319
AJAY KUMAR
BJPBJP353 votes at this polling station
over VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 353 | 60.34% | |
| 2 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 111 | 18.97% | |
| 3 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 88 | 15.04% | |
| 4 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 12 | 2.05% | |
| 5 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 5 | 0.85% | |
| 6 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 4 | 0.68% | |
| 7 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 4 | 0.68% | |
| 8 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 3 | 0.51% | |
| 9 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 3 | 0.51% | |
| 10 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 11 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 12 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 585 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 353 | 59.23% | 1 | 29 | Strong |
| SP | 111 | 18.62% | 2 | 303 | Weak |
| BSP | 88 | 14.77% | 3 | 183 | Weak |
| CPI | 12 | 2.01% | 4 | 8 | Poor |
| BSCP | 5 | 0.84% | 5 | 33 | Poor |
| BMP | 4 | 0.67% | 7 | 61 | Poor |
| AK | 4 | 0.67% | 6 | 172 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.50% | 8 | 276 | Poor |
| JAP | 3 | 0.50% | 9 | 251 | Poor |
| RVP | 1 | 0.17% | 11 | 272 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.17% | 10 | 257 | Poor |
| BSWP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 358 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.