PR. VI. BILAGAON PS 317
AJAY KUMAR
BJPBJP178 votes at this polling station
over VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 178 | 41.59% | |
| 2 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 175 | 40.89% | |
| 3 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 63 | 14.72% | |
| 4 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 3 | 0.70% | |
| 5 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 6 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 7 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 2 | 0.47% | |
| 8 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 9 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 10 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 11 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 428 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 178 | 41.20% | 1 | 205 | Strong |
| SP | 175 | 40.51% | 2 | 213 | Strong |
| BSP | 63 | 14.58% | 3 | 226 | Weak |
| INC | 3 | 0.69% | 4 | 275 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.46% | 7 | 305 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.46% | 6 | 181 | Poor |
| AK | 2 | 0.46% | 5 | 284 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.23% | 8 | 256 | Poor |
| CPI | 1 | 0.23% | 9 | 354 | Poor |
| RVP | 1 | 0.23% | 10 | 271 | Poor |
| BSWP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 357 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 378 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.