POORV. MA. VI. RANIPUR PS 315
AJAY KUMAR
BJPBJP232 votes at this polling station
over VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 232 | 59.34% | |
| 2 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 81 | 20.72% | |
| 3 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 47 | 12.02% | |
| 4 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 7 | 1.79% | |
| 5 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 5 | 1.28% | |
| 6 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 5 | 1.28% | |
| 7 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 3 | 0.77% | |
| 8 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 3 | 0.77% | |
| 9 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 3 | 0.77% | |
| 10 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 2 | 0.51% | |
| 11 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 2 | 0.51% | |
| 12 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 1 | 0.26% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 391 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 232 | 58.73% | 1 | 113 | Strong |
| SP | 81 | 20.51% | 2 | 338 | Weak |
| BSP | 47 | 11.90% | 3 | 264 | Weak |
| INC | 7 | 1.77% | 4 | 113 | Poor |
| BSWP | 5 | 1.27% | 5 | 13 | Poor |
| CPI | 5 | 1.27% | 6 | 123 | Poor |
| JAP | 3 | 0.76% | 8 | 250 | Poor |
| RVP | 3 | 0.76% | 9 | 111 | Poor |
| BMP | 3 | 0.76% | 7 | 109 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.51% | 11 | 180 | Poor |
| AK | 2 | 0.51% | 10 | 283 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.25% | 12 | 255 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.