POORV. MA. VI. MARKA ROOM N0 3 PS 31
VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV
SPSP550 votes at this polling station
over AJAY KUMAR (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 550 | 77.25% | |
| 2 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 67 | 9.41% | |
| 3 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 40 | 5.62% | |
| 4 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 15 | 2.11% | |
| 5 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 8 | 1.12% | |
| 6 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 6 | 0.84% | |
| 7 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 6 | 0.84% | |
| 8 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 5 | 0.70% | |
| 9 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 5 | 0.70% | |
| 10 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 4 | 0.56% | |
| 11 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 3 | 0.42% | |
| 12 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 3 | 0.42% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 712 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 550 | 75.65% | 1 | 6 | Strong |
| BJP | 67 | 9.22% | 2 | 334 | Poor |
| BSP | 40 | 5.50% | 3 | 290 | Poor |
| JAP | 15 | 2.06% | 4 | 65 | Poor |
| BMP | 8 | 1.10% | 5 | 6 | Poor |
| AK | 6 | 0.83% | 6 | 89 | Poor |
| RVP | 6 | 0.83% | 7 | 14 | Poor |
| BSWP | 5 | 0.69% | 9 | 6 | Poor |
| BSCP | 5 | 0.69% | 8 | 24 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.55% | 10 | 190 | Poor |
| ASP | 3 | 0.41% | 11 | 34 | Poor |
| CPI | 3 | 0.41% | 12 | 193 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.