PR. VI. MAWAI PS 306
VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV
SPSP292 votes at this polling station
over AJAY KUMAR (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 292 | 43.65% | |
| 2 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 262 | 39.16% | |
| 3 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 83 | 12.41% | |
| 4 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 11 | 1.64% | |
| 5 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 9 | 1.35% | |
| 6 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 4 | 0.60% | |
| 7 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 3 | 0.45% | |
| 8 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 9 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 10 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 11 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 669 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 292 | 42.82% | 1 | 80 | Strong |
| BJP | 262 | 38.42% | 2 | 82 | Average |
| BSP | 83 | 12.17% | 3 | 190 | Weak |
| INC | 11 | 1.61% | 4 | 37 | Poor |
| JAP | 9 | 1.32% | 5 | 104 | Poor |
| AK | 4 | 0.59% | 6 | 171 | Poor |
| CPI | 3 | 0.44% | 7 | 242 | Poor |
| ASP | 2 | 0.29% | 8 | 138 | Poor |
| BMP | 2 | 0.29% | 9 | 186 | Poor |
| BSWP | 1 | 0.15% | 10 | 232 | Poor |
| RVP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 363 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 371 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.