PR. VI. JAROHRA ROOM N0 1 PS 290
VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV
SPSP269 votes at this polling station
over RAMSEVAK SHUKLA (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 269 | 42.56% | |
| 2 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 249 | 39.40% | |
| 3 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 53 | 8.39% | |
| 4 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 34 | 5.38% | |
| 5 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 11 | 1.74% | |
| 6 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 5 | 0.79% | |
| 7 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 4 | 0.63% | |
| 8 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 3 | 0.47% | |
| 9 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 10 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 11 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 12 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 632 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 269 | 41.97% | 1 | 99 | Strong |
| BSP | 249 | 38.85% | 2 | 14 | Average |
| BJP | 53 | 8.27% | 3 | 348 | Poor |
| AK | 34 | 5.30% | 4 | 7 | Poor |
| JAP | 11 | 1.72% | 5 | 83 | Poor |
| RVP | 5 | 0.78% | 6 | 39 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.62% | 7 | 226 | Poor |
| CPI | 3 | 0.47% | 8 | 240 | Poor |
| BSWP | 2 | 0.31% | 9 | 118 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.16% | 11 | 268 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.16% | 10 | 248 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 369 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.