PR. VI. KORRAPURWA PS 280
RAMSEVAK SHUKLA
BSPBSP316 votes at this polling station
over VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 316 | 73.32% | |
| 2 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 52 | 12.06% | |
| 3 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 27 | 6.26% | |
| 4 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 21 | 4.87% | |
| 5 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 4 | 0.93% | |
| 6 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 3 | 0.70% | |
| 7 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 2 | 0.46% | |
| 8 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 2 | 0.46% | |
| 9 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 2 | 0.46% | |
| 10 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 11 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 12 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 431 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 316 | 72.64% | 1 | 6 | Strong |
| SP | 52 | 11.95% | 2 | 371 | Weak |
| JAP | 27 | 6.21% | 3 | 43 | Poor |
| BJP | 21 | 4.83% | 4 | 371 | Poor |
| CPI | 4 | 0.92% | 5 | 184 | Poor |
| AK | 3 | 0.69% | 6 | 218 | Poor |
| ASP | 2 | 0.46% | 7 | 132 | Poor |
| BMP | 2 | 0.46% | 8 | 182 | Poor |
| RVP | 2 | 0.46% | 9 | 171 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.23% | 10 | 266 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.23% | 11 | 347 | Poor |
| BSWP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 346 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.