PR. VI. KORRABUZURG PS 279
RAMSEVAK SHUKLA
BSPBSP220 votes at this polling station
over VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 220 | 32.93% | |
| 2 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 207 | 30.99% | |
| 3 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 147 | 22.01% | |
| 4 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 68 | 10.18% | |
| 5 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 5 | 0.75% | |
| 6 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 5 | 0.75% | |
| 7 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 4 | 0.60% | |
| 8 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 4 | 0.60% | |
| 9 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 3 | 0.45% | |
| 10 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 3 | 0.45% | |
| 11 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 12 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 668 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 220 | 32.54% | 1 | 30 | Average |
| SP | 207 | 30.62% | 2 | 168 | Average |
| BJP | 147 | 21.75% | 3 | 247 | Weak |
| JAP | 68 | 10.06% | 4 | 14 | Weak |
| BSCP | 5 | 0.74% | 6 | 31 | Poor |
| AK | 5 | 0.74% | 5 | 131 | Poor |
| CPI | 4 | 0.59% | 7 | 183 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.59% | 8 | 223 | Poor |
| BMP | 3 | 0.44% | 9 | 102 | Poor |
| RVP | 3 | 0.44% | 10 | 107 | Poor |
| BSWP | 2 | 0.30% | 11 | 113 | Poor |
| ASP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 355 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.