SANKUL BHAVAN KAMSIN PS 256
VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV
SPSP337 votes at this polling station
over AJAY KUMAR (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 337 | 50.68% | |
| 2 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 195 | 29.32% | |
| 3 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 106 | 15.94% | |
| 4 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 7 | 1.05% | |
| 5 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 7 | 1.05% | |
| 6 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 5 | 0.75% | |
| 7 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 4 | 0.60% | |
| 8 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 3 | 0.45% | |
| 9 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 10 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 665 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 337 | 49.85% | 1 | 47 | Strong |
| BJP | 195 | 28.85% | 2 | 169 | Average |
| BSP | 106 | 15.68% | 3 | 152 | Weak |
| CPI | 7 | 1.04% | 5 | 65 | Poor |
| AK | 7 | 1.04% | 4 | 85 | Poor |
| JAP | 5 | 0.74% | 6 | 167 | Poor |
| BMP | 4 | 0.59% | 7 | 58 | Poor |
| ASP | 3 | 0.44% | 8 | 56 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.15% | 9 | 344 | Poor |
| BSWP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 335 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 361 | Poor |
| RVP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 347 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.