PR. VI. DURGADAI'S PURVA KUMEDHASANI PS 251
VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV
SPSP355 votes at this polling station
over ASHOK KUMAR (JAP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 355 | 70.58% | |
| 2 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 60 | 11.93% | |
| 3 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 45 | 8.95% | |
| 4 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 26 | 5.17% | |
| 5 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 5 | 0.99% | |
| 6 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 4 | 0.80% | |
| 7 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 3 | 0.60% | |
| 8 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 9 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 10 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 11 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 12 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 503 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 355 | 69.74% | 1 | 39 | Strong |
| JAP | 60 | 11.79% | 2 | 18 | Weak |
| BSP | 45 | 8.84% | 3 | 271 | Poor |
| BJP | 26 | 5.11% | 4 | 366 | Poor |
| AK | 5 | 0.98% | 5 | 126 | Poor |
| BMP | 4 | 0.79% | 6 | 57 | Poor |
| CPI | 3 | 0.59% | 7 | 230 | Poor |
| BSWP | 2 | 0.39% | 8 | 105 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.20% | 10 | 264 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.20% | 9 | 236 | Poor |
| RVP | 1 | 0.20% | 11 | 250 | Poor |
| INC | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 373 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.