PR. VI. KUMEDHASANI ROOM N0 2 PS 250
VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV
SPSP224 votes at this polling station
over RAMSEVAK SHUKLA (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 224 | 44.36% | |
| 2 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 216 | 42.77% | |
| 3 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 29 | 5.74% | |
| 4 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 12 | 2.38% | |
| 5 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 6 | 1.19% | |
| 6 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 5 | 0.99% | |
| 7 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 3 | 0.59% | |
| 8 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 3 | 0.59% | |
| 9 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 10 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 11 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 12 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 1 | 0.20% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 505 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 224 | 44.01% | 1 | 147 | Strong |
| BSP | 216 | 42.44% | 2 | 32 | Strong |
| BJP | 29 | 5.70% | 3 | 364 | Poor |
| JAP | 12 | 2.36% | 4 | 75 | Poor |
| RVP | 6 | 1.18% | 5 | 20 | Poor |
| BMP | 5 | 0.98% | 6 | 30 | Poor |
| BSCP | 3 | 0.59% | 7 | 89 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.59% | 8 | 265 | Poor |
| ASP | 2 | 0.39% | 9 | 126 | Poor |
| AK | 2 | 0.39% | 10 | 277 | Poor |
| BSWP | 2 | 0.39% | 11 | 104 | Poor |
| CPI | 1 | 0.20% | 12 | 344 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.