PR. VI. MUSIWA PS 244
VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV
SPSP242 votes at this polling station
over AJAY KUMAR (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 242 | 49.59% | |
| 2 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 139 | 28.48% | |
| 3 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 71 | 14.55% | |
| 4 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 11 | 2.25% | |
| 5 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 5 | 1.02% | |
| 6 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 4 | 0.82% | |
| 7 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 4 | 0.82% | |
| 8 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 3 | 0.61% | |
| 9 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 3 | 0.61% | |
| 10 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 3 | 0.61% | |
| 11 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 2 | 0.41% | |
| 12 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 1 | 0.20% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 488 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 242 | 48.79% | 1 | 131 | Strong |
| BJP | 139 | 28.02% | 2 | 259 | Average |
| BSP | 71 | 14.31% | 3 | 211 | Weak |
| JAP | 11 | 2.22% | 4 | 82 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 1.01% | 5 | 177 | Poor |
| CPI | 4 | 0.81% | 7 | 175 | Poor |
| AK | 4 | 0.81% | 6 | 166 | Poor |
| ASP | 3 | 0.60% | 8 | 55 | Poor |
| BSCP | 3 | 0.60% | 9 | 88 | Poor |
| BSWP | 3 | 0.60% | 10 | 52 | Poor |
| BMP | 2 | 0.40% | 11 | 176 | Poor |
| RVP | 1 | 0.20% | 12 | 247 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.