PR. VI. BENAMAU PS 235
VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV
SPSP352 votes at this polling station
over AJAY KUMAR (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 352 | 78.05% | |
| 2 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 55 | 12.20% | |
| 3 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 34 | 7.54% | |
| 4 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 3 | 0.67% | |
| 5 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 2 | 0.44% | |
| 6 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 2 | 0.44% | |
| 7 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 8 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 9 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 10 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 451 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 352 | 76.86% | 1 | 42 | Strong |
| BJP | 55 | 12.01% | 2 | 345 | Weak |
| BSP | 34 | 7.42% | 3 | 307 | Poor |
| BSWP | 3 | 0.66% | 4 | 49 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.44% | 5 | 160 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.44% | 6 | 297 | Poor |
| RVP | 1 | 0.22% | 9 | 246 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.22% | 7 | 230 | Poor |
| AK | 1 | 0.22% | 8 | 325 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 356 | Poor |
| CPI | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 377 | Poor |
| INC | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 369 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.