U. PR. VI. AMLOKHAR NAVEEN (1-8 COMPOSITE) ROOM N0 1 PS 229
VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV
SPSP177 votes at this polling station
over RAMSEVAK SHUKLA (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 177 | 38.56% | |
| 2 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 143 | 31.15% | |
| 3 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 110 | 23.97% | |
| 4 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 6 | 1.31% | |
| 5 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 5 | 1.09% | |
| 6 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 4 | 0.87% | |
| 7 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 4 | 0.87% | |
| 8 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 2 | 0.44% | |
| 9 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 2 | 0.44% | |
| 10 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 2 | 0.44% | |
| 11 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 2 | 0.44% | |
| 12 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 2 | 0.44% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 459 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 177 | 37.90% | 1 | 208 | Average |
| BSP | 143 | 30.62% | 2 | 88 | Average |
| BJP | 110 | 23.55% | 3 | 291 | Weak |
| BMP | 6 | 1.28% | 4 | 14 | Poor |
| RVP | 5 | 1.07% | 5 | 37 | Poor |
| CPI | 4 | 0.86% | 6 | 174 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.86% | 7 | 216 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.43% | 12 | 295 | Poor |
| BSWP | 2 | 0.43% | 11 | 100 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.43% | 10 | 158 | Poor |
| ASP | 2 | 0.43% | 8 | 119 | Poor |
| AK | 2 | 0.43% | 9 | 275 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.