PR. VI. SYOHAT PS 228
VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV
SPSP401 votes at this polling station
over AJAY KUMAR (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 401 | 56.80% | |
| 2 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 201 | 28.47% | |
| 3 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 79 | 11.19% | |
| 4 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 5 | 0.71% | |
| 5 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 4 | 0.57% | |
| 6 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 4 | 0.57% | |
| 7 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 4 | 0.57% | |
| 8 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 3 | 0.42% | |
| 9 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 2 | 0.28% | |
| 10 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 2 | 0.28% | |
| 11 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 12 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 706 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 401 | 56.16% | 1 | 26 | Strong |
| BJP | 201 | 28.15% | 2 | 160 | Average |
| BSP | 79 | 11.06% | 3 | 198 | Weak |
| CPI | 5 | 0.70% | 4 | 118 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.56% | 7 | 215 | Poor |
| ASP | 4 | 0.56% | 5 | 22 | Poor |
| AK | 4 | 0.56% | 6 | 165 | Poor |
| JAP | 3 | 0.42% | 8 | 241 | Poor |
| RVP | 2 | 0.28% | 10 | 164 | Poor |
| BMP | 2 | 0.28% | 9 | 172 | Poor |
| BSWP | 1 | 0.14% | 11 | 215 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 357 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.