POORV. MA. VI. ITARABADHUANI PS 224
AJAY KUMAR
BJPBJP301 votes at this polling station
over VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 301 | 40.68% | |
| 2 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 291 | 39.32% | |
| 3 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 112 | 15.14% | |
| 4 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 6 | 0.81% | |
| 5 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 6 | 0.81% | |
| 6 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 5 | 0.68% | |
| 7 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 5 | 0.68% | |
| 8 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 5 | 0.68% | |
| 9 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 4 | 0.54% | |
| 10 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 3 | 0.41% | |
| 11 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 2 | 0.27% | |
| 12 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 740 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 301 | 40.35% | 1 | 52 | Strong |
| SP | 291 | 39.01% | 2 | 81 | Average |
| BSP | 112 | 15.01% | 3 | 142 | Weak |
| CPI | 6 | 0.80% | 5 | 85 | Poor |
| BSCP | 6 | 0.80% | 4 | 21 | Poor |
| JAP | 5 | 0.67% | 8 | 165 | Poor |
| BSWP | 5 | 0.67% | 7 | 10 | Poor |
| AK | 5 | 0.67% | 6 | 125 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.54% | 9 | 214 | Poor |
| ASP | 3 | 0.40% | 10 | 52 | Poor |
| RVP | 2 | 0.27% | 11 | 162 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 355 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.