PR. VI. JORAWARPUR PS 221
AJAY KUMAR
BJPBJP280 votes at this polling station
over RAMSEVAK SHUKLA (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 280 | 59.96% | |
| 2 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 88 | 18.84% | |
| 3 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 70 | 14.99% | |
| 4 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 10 | 2.14% | |
| 5 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 6 | 1.28% | |
| 6 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 4 | 0.86% | |
| 7 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 3 | 0.64% | |
| 8 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 2 | 0.43% | |
| 9 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 10 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 11 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 12 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 1 | 0.21% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 467 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 280 | 59.07% | 1 | 66 | Strong |
| BSP | 88 | 18.57% | 2 | 182 | Weak |
| SP | 70 | 14.77% | 3 | 356 | Weak |
| INC | 10 | 2.11% | 4 | 47 | Poor |
| JAP | 6 | 1.27% | 5 | 144 | Poor |
| CPI | 4 | 0.84% | 6 | 171 | Poor |
| BMP | 3 | 0.63% | 7 | 94 | Poor |
| AK | 2 | 0.42% | 8 | 274 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.21% | 9 | 228 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.21% | 10 | 257 | Poor |
| RVP | 1 | 0.21% | 12 | 242 | Poor |
| BSWP | 1 | 0.21% | 11 | 213 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.