PR. VI. SHAMSUDDINPUR PS 22
VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV
SPSP385 votes at this polling station
over AJAY KUMAR (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 385 | 52.03% | |
| 2 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 293 | 39.59% | |
| 3 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 21 | 2.84% | |
| 4 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 15 | 2.03% | |
| 5 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 12 | 1.62% | |
| 6 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 6 | 0.81% | |
| 7 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 3 | 0.41% | |
| 8 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 2 | 0.27% | |
| 9 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 2 | 0.27% | |
| 10 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 11 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 740 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 385 | 51.33% | 1 | 29 | Strong |
| BJP | 293 | 39.07% | 2 | 57 | Average |
| INC | 21 | 2.80% | 3 | 5 | Poor |
| BSP | 15 | 2.00% | 4 | 347 | Poor |
| AK | 12 | 1.60% | 5 | 25 | Poor |
| JAP | 6 | 0.80% | 6 | 137 | Poor |
| BSCP | 3 | 0.40% | 7 | 62 | Poor |
| BSWP | 2 | 0.27% | 8 | 68 | Poor |
| CPI | 2 | 0.27% | 9 | 256 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.13% | 10 | 160 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 317 | Poor |
| RVP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 289 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.