PR. VI. LAKHANPUR PS 219

AC 233 · 2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polled most here

AJAY KUMAR

BJPBJP

247 votes at this polling station

Lead over second

17 3.0 pp

votes

over RAMSEVAK SHUKLA (BSP)

The electorate

2022 booth list · roll and turnout

Total electors1,017

Total turnout578votes cast at this station

Turnout %56.8% of this booth's roll

Male electors294

Female electors284

Vote share in this booth

of 569 votes counted

BJP 43.4% BSP 40.4% SP 9.3% AK 2.3% CPI 1.4% BSCP 0.7% INC 0.7% BMP 0.5% RVP 0.4% ASP 0.4% BSWP 0.4% JAP 0.2%

Candidates at this booth

12 rows · Form 20

#	Candidate	Party	Votes	Share
1	AJAY KUMAR	BJP	247	43.41%
2	RAMSEVAK SHUKLA	BSP	230	40.42%
3	VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV	SP	53	9.31%
4	SIMMI BURMAN	AK	13	2.28%
5	Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS	CPI	8	1.41%
6	JIYALAL DHURIYA	BSCP	4	0.70%
7	GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL	INC	4	0.70%
8	SAMTA DEVI	BMP	3	0.53%
9	RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA	RVP	2	0.35%
10	JAGROOP BHASKAR	ASP	2	0.35%
11	JAYPAL	BSWP	2	0.35%
12	ASHOK KUMAR	JAP	1	0.18%

Share is each candidate's votes over the 569 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.

Party status in this booth

12 parties · AC 233

Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.

Party	Votes	% of booth	Rank here	Booth rank for party	Status
BJP	247	42.73%	1	90	Strong
BSP	230	39.79%	2	21	Average
SP	53	9.17%	3	370	Poor
AK	13	2.25%	4	22	Poor
CPI	8	1.38%	5	43	Poor
INC	4	0.69%	7	213	Poor
BSCP	4	0.69%	6	46	Poor
BMP	3	0.52%	8	93	Poor
ASP	2	0.35%	9	116	Poor
BSWP	2	0.35%	10	97	Poor
RVP	2	0.35%	11	161	Poor
JAP	1	0.17%	12	335	Poor

"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.

Where this comes from

2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.