PR. VI. KATHAR PS 209
VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV
SPSP237 votes at this polling station
over AJAY KUMAR (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 237 | 60.61% | |
| 2 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 89 | 22.76% | |
| 3 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 51 | 13.04% | |
| 4 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 5 | 1.28% | |
| 5 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 3 | 0.77% | |
| 6 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 2 | 0.51% | |
| 7 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 1 | 0.26% | |
| 8 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 1 | 0.26% | |
| 9 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 1 | 0.26% | |
| 10 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 1 | 0.26% | |
| 11 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 391 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 237 | 60.00% | 1 | 133 | Strong |
| BJP | 89 | 22.53% | 2 | 311 | Weak |
| BSP | 51 | 12.91% | 3 | 251 | Weak |
| JAP | 5 | 1.27% | 4 | 164 | Poor |
| CPI | 3 | 0.76% | 5 | 223 | Poor |
| RVP | 2 | 0.51% | 6 | 158 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.25% | 9 | 253 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.25% | 10 | 339 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.25% | 7 | 224 | Poor |
| AK | 1 | 0.25% | 8 | 322 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 352 | Poor |
| BSWP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 328 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.