PR. VI. AUDAHA PS 198
AJAY KUMAR
BJPBJP235 votes at this polling station
over VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 235 | 39.36% | |
| 2 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 226 | 37.86% | |
| 3 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 110 | 18.43% | |
| 4 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 7 | 1.17% | |
| 5 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 4 | 0.67% | |
| 6 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 4 | 0.67% | |
| 7 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 3 | 0.50% | |
| 8 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 3 | 0.50% | |
| 9 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 10 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 11 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 12 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 1 | 0.17% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 597 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 235 | 38.46% | 1 | 105 | Average |
| SP | 226 | 36.99% | 2 | 145 | Average |
| BSP | 110 | 18.00% | 3 | 149 | Weak |
| INC | 7 | 1.15% | 4 | 105 | Poor |
| AK | 4 | 0.65% | 5 | 159 | Poor |
| RVP | 4 | 0.65% | 6 | 51 | Poor |
| JAP | 3 | 0.49% | 8 | 235 | Poor |
| BSWP | 3 | 0.49% | 7 | 45 | Poor |
| ASP | 2 | 0.33% | 9 | 113 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.16% | 10 | 267 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.16% | 11 | 247 | Poor |
| CPI | 1 | 0.16% | 12 | 333 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.