PR. VI. MUDWARA ROOM N0 1 PS 196
AJAY KUMAR
BJPBJP355 votes at this polling station
over VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 355 | 70.58% | |
| 2 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 79 | 15.71% | |
| 3 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 41 | 8.15% | |
| 4 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 8 | 1.59% | |
| 5 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 5 | 0.99% | |
| 6 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 5 | 0.99% | |
| 7 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 3 | 0.60% | |
| 8 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 3 | 0.60% | |
| 9 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 10 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 11 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 12 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 503 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 355 | 67.88% | 1 | 26 | Strong |
| SP | 79 | 15.11% | 2 | 340 | Weak |
| BSP | 41 | 7.84% | 3 | 289 | Poor |
| INC | 8 | 1.53% | 4 | 75 | Poor |
| JAP | 5 | 0.96% | 6 | 162 | Poor |
| CPI | 5 | 0.96% | 5 | 115 | Poor |
| BMP | 3 | 0.57% | 7 | 87 | Poor |
| BSCP | 3 | 0.57% | 8 | 83 | Poor |
| RVP | 2 | 0.38% | 9 | 156 | Poor |
| BSWP | 1 | 0.19% | 11 | 206 | Poor |
| AK | 1 | 0.19% | 10 | 318 | Poor |
| ASP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 332 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.