PR. VI. MATEHNA PS 195
VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV
SPSP300 votes at this polling station
over AJAY KUMAR (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 300 | 47.17% | |
| 2 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 221 | 34.75% | |
| 3 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 77 | 12.11% | |
| 4 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 8 | 1.26% | |
| 5 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 8 | 1.26% | |
| 6 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 5 | 0.79% | |
| 7 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 4 | 0.63% | |
| 8 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 4 | 0.63% | |
| 9 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 3 | 0.47% | |
| 10 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 2 | 0.31% | |
| 11 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 2 | 0.31% | |
| 12 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 2 | 0.31% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 636 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 300 | 46.88% | 1 | 73 | Strong |
| BJP | 221 | 34.53% | 2 | 127 | Average |
| BSP | 77 | 12.03% | 3 | 200 | Weak |
| INC | 8 | 1.25% | 4 | 74 | Poor |
| JAP | 8 | 1.25% | 5 | 117 | Poor |
| RVP | 5 | 0.78% | 6 | 33 | Poor |
| BMP | 4 | 0.63% | 8 | 52 | Poor |
| AK | 4 | 0.63% | 7 | 158 | Poor |
| CPI | 3 | 0.47% | 9 | 219 | Poor |
| ASP | 2 | 0.31% | 10 | 112 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.31% | 11 | 155 | Poor |
| BSWP | 2 | 0.31% | 12 | 92 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.