PR. VI. MAU ROOM N0 1 PS 186
AJAY KUMAR
BJPBJP384 votes at this polling station
over VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 384 | 65.31% | |
| 2 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 97 | 16.50% | |
| 3 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 76 | 12.93% | |
| 4 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 12 | 2.04% | |
| 5 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 7 | 1.19% | |
| 6 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 6 | 1.02% | |
| 7 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 8 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 9 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 10 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 11 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 12 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 588 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 384 | 64.43% | 1 | 16 | Strong |
| SP | 97 | 16.28% | 2 | 325 | Weak |
| BSP | 76 | 12.75% | 3 | 201 | Weak |
| JAP | 12 | 2.01% | 4 | 74 | Poor |
| INC | 7 | 1.17% | 5 | 104 | Poor |
| CPI | 6 | 1.01% | 6 | 81 | Poor |
| BMP | 2 | 0.34% | 7 | 165 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.17% | 10 | 243 | Poor |
| ASP | 1 | 0.17% | 8 | 215 | Poor |
| AK | 1 | 0.17% | 9 | 317 | Poor |
| BSWP | 1 | 0.17% | 11 | 202 | Poor |
| RVP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 335 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.