PR. VI. ANDAULI ROOM N0 2 PS 170
VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV
SPSP381 votes at this polling station
over AJAY KUMAR (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 381 | 64.03% | |
| 2 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 96 | 16.13% | |
| 3 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 90 | 15.13% | |
| 4 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 9 | 1.51% | |
| 5 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 5 | 0.84% | |
| 6 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 5 | 0.84% | |
| 7 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 4 | 0.67% | |
| 8 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 9 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 10 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 11 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 595 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 381 | 63.71% | 1 | 30 | Strong |
| BJP | 96 | 16.05% | 2 | 304 | Weak |
| BSP | 90 | 15.05% | 3 | 178 | Weak |
| JAP | 9 | 1.51% | 4 | 99 | Poor |
| BSWP | 5 | 0.84% | 5 | 7 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 0.84% | 6 | 171 | Poor |
| AK | 4 | 0.67% | 7 | 154 | Poor |
| ASP | 2 | 0.33% | 8 | 110 | Poor |
| BMP | 2 | 0.33% | 9 | 162 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.17% | 10 | 238 | Poor |
| CPI | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 374 | Poor |
| RVP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 329 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.