PR. VI. MANTHA PS 17
AJAY KUMAR
BJPBJP172 votes at this polling station
over RAMSEVAK SHUKLA (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 172 | 29.45% | |
| 2 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 162 | 27.74% | |
| 3 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 145 | 24.83% | |
| 4 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 66 | 11.30% | |
| 5 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 7 | 1.20% | |
| 6 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 7 | 1.20% | |
| 7 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 7 | 1.20% | |
| 8 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 5 | 0.86% | |
| 9 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 5 | 0.86% | |
| 10 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 4 | 0.68% | |
| 11 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 3 | 0.51% | |
| 12 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 1 | 0.17% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 584 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 172 | 29.10% | 1 | 215 | Average |
| BSP | 162 | 27.41% | 2 | 64 | Average |
| SP | 145 | 24.53% | 3 | 239 | Weak |
| JAP | 66 | 11.17% | 4 | 16 | Weak |
| RVP | 7 | 1.18% | 7 | 9 | Poor |
| BSCP | 7 | 1.18% | 5 | 12 | Poor |
| INC | 7 | 1.18% | 6 | 89 | Poor |
| BMP | 5 | 0.85% | 9 | 22 | Poor |
| AK | 5 | 0.85% | 8 | 106 | Poor |
| ASP | 4 | 0.68% | 10 | 13 | Poor |
| BSWP | 3 | 0.51% | 11 | 24 | Poor |
| CPI | 1 | 0.17% | 12 | 309 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.