PR. VI. SANTER PS 161
AJAY KUMAR
BJPBJP308 votes at this polling station
over VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 308 | 39.90% | |
| 2 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 182 | 23.58% | |
| 3 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 179 | 23.19% | |
| 4 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 74 | 9.59% | |
| 5 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 10 | 1.30% | |
| 6 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 5 | 0.65% | |
| 7 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 3 | 0.39% | |
| 8 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 3 | 0.39% | |
| 9 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 2 | 0.26% | |
| 10 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 2 | 0.26% | |
| 11 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 2 | 0.26% | |
| 12 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 2 | 0.26% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 772 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 308 | 39.84% | 1 | 49 | Average |
| SP | 182 | 23.54% | 2 | 202 | Weak |
| BSP | 179 | 23.16% | 3 | 50 | Weak |
| JAP | 74 | 9.57% | 4 | 10 | Poor |
| INC | 10 | 1.29% | 5 | 46 | Poor |
| BSCP | 5 | 0.65% | 6 | 26 | Poor |
| BSWP | 3 | 0.39% | 8 | 40 | Poor |
| AK | 3 | 0.39% | 7 | 204 | Poor |
| ASP | 2 | 0.26% | 9 | 107 | Poor |
| BMP | 2 | 0.26% | 10 | 160 | Poor |
| CPI | 2 | 0.26% | 11 | 279 | Poor |
| RVP | 2 | 0.26% | 12 | 148 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.