PR. VI. PHUFUNDI ROOM N0 2 PS 151
AJAY KUMAR
BJPBJP255 votes at this polling station
over VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 255 | 47.66% | |
| 2 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 190 | 35.51% | |
| 3 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 58 | 10.84% | |
| 4 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 12 | 2.24% | |
| 5 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 6 | 1.12% | |
| 6 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 5 | 0.93% | |
| 7 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 4 | 0.75% | |
| 8 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 9 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 10 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 11 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 12 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 535 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 255 | 56.29% | 1 | 88 | Strong |
| SP | 190 | 41.94% | 2 | 193 | Strong |
| BSP | 58 | 12.80% | 3 | 237 | Weak |
| JAP | 12 | 2.65% | 4 | 73 | Poor |
| CPI | 6 | 1.32% | 5 | 80 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 1.10% | 6 | 169 | Poor |
| ASP | 4 | 0.88% | 7 | 17 | Poor |
| BSCP | 2 | 0.44% | 8 | 148 | Poor |
| RVP | 1 | 0.22% | 11 | 222 | Poor |
| AK | 1 | 0.22% | 9 | 313 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.22% | 10 | 253 | Poor |
| BSWP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 311 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.