PR. VI. KORRAM ROOM N0 2 PS 145
RAMSEVAK SHUKLA
BSPBSP288 votes at this polling station
over AJAY KUMAR (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 288 | 41.86% | |
| 2 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 213 | 30.96% | |
| 3 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 158 | 22.97% | |
| 4 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 7 | 1.02% | |
| 5 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 5 | 0.73% | |
| 6 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 4 | 0.58% | |
| 7 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 4 | 0.58% | |
| 8 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 3 | 0.44% | |
| 9 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 3 | 0.44% | |
| 10 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 2 | 0.29% | |
| 11 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 12 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 688 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 288 | 40.85% | 1 | 7 | Strong |
| BJP | 213 | 30.21% | 2 | 143 | Average |
| SP | 158 | 22.41% | 3 | 227 | Weak |
| INC | 7 | 0.99% | 4 | 100 | Poor |
| CPI | 5 | 0.71% | 5 | 110 | Poor |
| BSWP | 4 | 0.57% | 7 | 17 | Poor |
| AK | 4 | 0.57% | 6 | 152 | Poor |
| BMP | 3 | 0.43% | 8 | 81 | Poor |
| RVP | 3 | 0.43% | 9 | 90 | Poor |
| ASP | 2 | 0.28% | 10 | 102 | Poor |
| JAP | 1 | 0.14% | 11 | 326 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 336 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.