J.B.I.C. MURVAL ROOM N0 3 PS 132
AJAY KUMAR
BJPBJP420 votes at this polling station
over VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AJAY KUMAR | BJP | 420 | 77.21% | |
| 2 | VISHAMBHAR SINGH YADAV | SP | 63 | 11.58% | |
| 3 | RAMSEVAK SHUKLA | BSP | 39 | 7.17% | |
| 4 | GAJENDRA SINGH PATEL | INC | 10 | 1.84% | |
| 5 | Dr. RAM CHANDRA SARAS | CPI | 4 | 0.74% | |
| 6 | JAGROOP BHASKAR | ASP | 3 | 0.55% | |
| 7 | SAMTA DEVI | BMP | 3 | 0.55% | |
| 8 | JIYALAL DHURIYA | BSCP | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 9 | RAJBAHADUR KUSHWAHA | RVP | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 10 | JAYPAL | BSWP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | ASHOK KUMAR | JAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | SIMMI BURMAN | AK | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 544 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 420 | 76.78% | 1 | 6 | Strong |
| SP | 63 | 11.52% | 2 | 362 | Weak |
| BSP | 39 | 7.13% | 3 | 292 | Poor |
| INC | 10 | 1.83% | 4 | 44 | Poor |
| CPI | 4 | 0.73% | 5 | 160 | Poor |
| BMP | 3 | 0.55% | 7 | 79 | Poor |
| ASP | 3 | 0.55% | 6 | 42 | Poor |
| BSCP | 1 | 0.18% | 8 | 230 | Poor |
| RVP | 1 | 0.18% | 9 | 220 | Poor |
| AK | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 368 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 365 | Poor |
| BSWP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 306 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 233, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.